Journal Details
Instructions for AuthorsSubmission
Manuscripts should be submitted via the web to: Anne Wyatt Brown & Dana Burr Bradley, Co-Editors, at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/uaha 1. Direct all inquiries to the editorial office via e-mail: JAHA@wku.edu 2. If applicable, include written permission of authors(s) and publisher(s) to use any previously published material (figures, images, tables, or quotations) 3. Submission of a manuscript to the Journal implies commitment to publish in it. Articles under consideration elsewhere are unacceptable. Manuscript Preparation Type the manuscript with ample margins, using double spacing throughout, including the reference section, and organized as follows.
Peer Review Policy on Journal of Aging, Humanities, and the Arts
Studies and all manuscripts are peer reviewed anonymously following the procedure outlined below. Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, or conference organizers. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process upon request from the editorial office. Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editor (s) first evaluate(s) all manuscripts. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are
passed on to at least 2 experts for review. Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt. Type of peer review
This journal employs double blind reviewing; author and reviewer remain anonymous throughout the process. (you said this before)
How the referee is selected Referees are matched to the submission according to their expertise. (Is this necessary?)
Referee reports Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
- Is original - Is the scholarship evident and sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has conclusions which are clear are reflect the evidence presented - Correctly references previous relevant work Referees are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process. (Why say this?)
How long does the review process take?
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within two months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript.
Final report
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees.
Editor's Decision is final
Referees advise the editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. |
