Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking.

PPR is committed to:

• bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems
• providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice
• the critical evaluation of practice and the progressive search for practical guidance
• presenting research in an accessible, succinct style, not overly theoretical, but analytical

PPR builds into a significant resource base for practitioners, researchers, teachers and students.

 

Peer Review Statement
All research articles published in Planning Practice & Research have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous double-blind refereeing.
All practice forum articles and review papers have ungergone rigorous review by members of the editorial board.

Disclaimer
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in its publications. However, Taylor & Francis and its agents and licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any purpose of the Content and disclaim all such representations and warranties whether express or implied to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not the views of Taylor & Francis.